A Wake-Up Call for the UK: Why It’s Falling Behind in the Global Bitcoin Race
Whereas the UK authorities has expressed a need to be a world hub for digital property, actuality tells a unique story. The British crypto group is sounding the alarm, arguing that the nation is falling behind within the world Bitcoin race.
Specialists from crypto organizations throughout the UK advised BeInCrypto that the nation’s cautious method stifles innovation and drives companies offshore. This continued atmosphere will evaporate any aggressive benefit the UK used to have in monetary innovation.
A Lagging Monetary Hub
The widespread consensus among the many crypto group throughout the UK is that the legislative inertia in fostering a aggressive crypto hub within the area is alarmingly slow.
As countries across the globe race to develop clear and complete frameworks, even a number of the UK’s main politicians have made public statements on the scenario.
Earlier this month, former Chancellor and present Coinbase advisor George Osborne revealed an opinion piece arguing that the UK is susceptible to lacking a second wave of digital asset innovation. He expressed concern that the nation’s gradual regulatory progress permits different nations to tug forward.
“What I see makes me anxious. Removed from being an early adopter, now we have allowed ourselves to be left behind,” he wrote.
The sentiment amongst crypto customers within the area is essentially the identical.
Is the FCA Defending Shoppers or Pushing Them Offshore?
The UK’s regulatory stance at present seems to be one among excessive warning. Specialists argue that the nation’s overreliance on regulation actively damages its competitiveness.
“The UK talks about being a hub for digital property, however in follow, the atmosphere feels hostile. Gradual approvals, infinite crimson tape, and fixed uncertainty imply innovation is stifled earlier than it may well start,” stated Jordan Walker of The Bitcoin Collective.
This sample of regulatory motion just isn’t new. The playbook of regulation by enforcement was additionally utilized in the course of the management of former US SEC Chair Gary Gensler. Throughout that point, many within the crypto business attributed this technique to the US’ failure to maintain a competitive edge within the crypto sector.
The same state of affairs is now going down within the UK. The present hostility has led to a major debanking drawback, the place conventional monetary establishments, adhering to requirements set by the Monetary Conduct Authority (FCA), sever ties with crypto firms.
“The FCA’s method isn’t defending shoppers, it’s harming them by slicing off entry and pushing alternative offshore.” Susie Violet Ward, CEO of Bitcoin Coverage UK, advised BeInCrypto.
The UK regulator’s method to classifying crypto property has intensified these challenges.
The Downside with Asset Classification
The FCA at present applies a “identical threat, identical regulation” method to all digital property. This methodology fails to acknowledge totally different cryptocurrencies’ distinctive technical and financial traits.
The regulator has traditionally grouped all property beneath a broad “high-risk, speculative investments” label. Whereas this definition is true to an extent, it fails to differentiate between Bitcoin, a decentralized network with a set provide, and different classes like meme cash or crypto tokens.
“We’ve seen firms go away the UK because of debanking, restricted retail entry to Bitcoin merchandise, and a scarcity of readability from the FCA. It’s a wrestle to function right here in comparison with different jurisdictions that transfer quicker and provides companies room to innovate,” Walker famous.
By treating them the identical, critics argue that this misclassification applies ill-suited rules, producing confusion and pointless boundaries for official companies.
Past these definitions, the regulator’s ban on the sale of sure crypto-related funding merchandise has additionally slowed the tempo of innovation.
Can the UK Catch As much as the US on Retail Crypto Merchandise?
In October 2020, the FCA enacted a coverage prohibiting the sale, advertising, and distribution of derivatives and exchange-traded notes (ETNs). The regulator cited safety dangers, unstable costs, and a scarcity of official funding wants.
This ban has held robust for almost 5 years. Solely not too long ago, in a major coverage reversal, the FCA introduced that it’ll open retail entry to crypto ETNs beginning in October 2025. Nevertheless, critics argue that it is a gradual and inadequate step.
“It’s about time. For 2 and a half years, we… have been pushing to overturn the illogical ban on retail entry to exchange-traded Bitcoin merchandise… This restriction has solely deprived UK shoppers and held again market progress,” Freddie New, Chief Coverage Officer at Bitcoin Coverage UK, advised BeInCrypto.
In distinction, the US has already solid forward. In early 2024, the Securities and Alternate Fee (SEC) authorized spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), a transfer that has since had an enormous influence available on the market. Nevertheless, this motion got here with its personal set of challenges. The approval adopted a decade of rejections and solely got here after a federal courtroom dominated in favor of their approval.
Along with issues over the UK’s cautious regulatory method, friction factors come up relating to how the country taxes crypto.
A Complicated Tax and Accounting Regime
The UK’s method to crypto accounting beneath HMRC, the nation’s tax authority, is a supply of rivalry. The incoming Cryptoasset Reporting Framework (CARF) represents a major improvement. Starting in January 2026, the HMRC would require detailed id and transaction reporting from crypto customers and platforms.
Whereas designed to fight tax evasion, critics argue that CARF gives solely an incomplete image of a person’s tax obligations and raises critical privateness issues. The aggregated knowledge fails to offer the detailed context wanted for correct tax calculations, probably resulting in pointless investigations.
Present tax guidelines imposed by HMRC are additionally laborious to observe. The regulator views crypto as an asset subject to Capital Gains Tax, which requires people to meticulously observe each transaction’s authentic value and worth, together with crypto-to-crypto swaps.
Including to the complexity, HMRC has particular rules, just like the Mattress and Breakfasting Rule, which prevents traders from promoting a cryptoasset at a loss and instantly shopping for it again to reduce their tax bill.
This method is very burdensome for energetic merchants and infrequently requires them to make use of specialised software program to handle their tax reviews. Compounding this, the federal government has lowered the tax-free allowance for capital beneficial properties, pulling an rising variety of small-scale crypto customers into the tax internet.
In distinction, the US system offers a clearer benefit for long-term holding. If an asset is held for over a 12 months, it’s topic to a a lot decrease revenue tax fee. Whereas each international locations enable traders to make use of losses to offset beneficial properties, the US is broadly thought-about extra easy.
How the UK Can Regain Its Foothold
As different nations progress, the UK should adapt its insurance policies to help the digital finance sector and preserve its foothold within the crypto race. Although its emphasis on essential guardrails is important in sustaining shopper confidence, the jurisdiction lacks a transparent and balanced framework to foster innovation.
“The UK has the expertise and potential, however it’s choking progress with overregulation,” Walker concluded.
The UK can at all times change its method, however the velocity of its motion will probably be essential. How shortly it adapts its insurance policies will decide whether or not it catches up or is completely left behind.
The submit A Wake-Up Call for the UK: Why It’s Falling Behind in the Global Bitcoin Race appeared first on BeInCrypto.


The Bitcoin & Crypto Accountant
(@Thesecretinves2)