US Bitcoin ETFs Dominate Spot Volume with $10B Daily Trading – Is This Dangerous?
US Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have captured a commanding share of spot buying and selling volumes, often producing $5-10 billion in each day exercise that rivals main crypto exchanges, in accordance with CQ Julio, Head of Analysis at CryptoQuant.
The surge comes as Ethereum ETFs expertise large momentum, with $4 billion in internet inflows in August.
Binance Nonetheless Leads, However ETFs Problem Change Dominance
Bitcoin ETFs now account for 13.1% of whole spot buying and selling quantity for the reason that US presidential election, making them the third-largest buying and selling venue behind Binance’s dominant 29.1% and Crypto.com’s 13.5% shares.
CryptoQuant data reveals that these funds often exceed these of most centralized exchanges in each day quantity, with peak exercise reaching $10 billion throughout high-volatility intervals.
Binance maintains its management place with Bitcoin volumes reaching $10-18 billion on energetic buying and selling days.
Throughout Bitcoin’s latest all-time excessive on August 13, Binance recorded $7 billion in spot quantity in comparison with ETFs’ $4.8 billion.
Different main exchanges embody Bybit, with a 9% market share, Coinbase at 6%, and Bullish, which instructions 5%.
Nonetheless, Ethereum paints a starkly completely different picture. ETFs seize merely 4.4% of ETH spot buying and selling quantity.
Binance dominates Ethereum buying and selling with a 35% market share since November, adopted by Crypto.com at 20% and Bybit at 6%.
ETF Flows Sign Main Institutional Rotation Into Ethereum
Ethereum ETFs extended their winning streak to seven consecutive days by August 28, accumulating $309 million in recent inflows. BlackRock’s ETHA dominated with $262.6 million, whereas Constancy’s FETH added $20.5 million.
Notably, Grayscale’s flagship ETHE recorded uncommon optimistic flows of $5.7 million after months of heavy redemptions.
The momentum shift is turning into even clearer. Matt Hougan’s evaluation of August flows reveals that Bitcoin ETFs recorded internet outflows of roughly $800 million, whereas Ethereum ETFs attracted $4 billion in internet inflows.
This $4.8 billion month-to-month differential favoring ETH significantly factors to a decisive institutional choice rotation.
Bitcoin ETFs maintained regular however modest progress with $81 million in each day inflows on August 27. BlackRock’s IBIT led with $50.9 million, supported by Constancy’s FBTC at $14.6 million.
Whole Bitcoin ETF property reached $144.6 billion, representing 6.5% of Bitcoin’s market capitalization. In the meantime, Ethereum ETFs maintain $30.17 billion, equal to five.4% of Ether’s market capitalization.
Company treasury exercise accelerated the institutional shift. BitMine Immersion Applied sciences acquired $2.2 billion worth of ETH in a single week, turning into the world’s largest company Ethereum holder with 1.7 million ETH valued at $8.82 billion.
Market analysts word that declining Bitcoin dominance, under 58%, is attributed to over 45 altcoins outperforming BTC prior to now 90 days.
The Altseason Index surged to 61 after months under 55, with full-scale altseason sometimes starting at 75.
Simply yesterday, Michaël van de Poppe additionally predicted altseason will commence within 4-6 weeks, doubtlessly driving ETH to $5,200 and SOL to $250 in This fall.
Company Bitcoin Treasury Methods Face Credit score Cycle Dangers
Company Bitcoin holdings have exploded to $408 billion throughout 310 entities, however new analysis warns this “harmful recreation” will doubtless see most contributors fail throughout a full credit score cycle.
Sentora’s analysis identifies essential flaws in methods that contain “borrowing billions in fiat, issuing new fairness, and restructuring whole stability sheets to amass Bitcoin.”
The analysis categorizes Bitcoin treasury methods as “negative-carry trades” the place corporations borrow fiat to amass non-yielding property.
Not like conventional carry trades with optimistic yield cushions, Bitcoin methods supply “no yield cushion, no impartial carry, and no risk-parity ballast.”
MicroStrategy pioneered the mannequin, using $3.7 billion in ultra-low-coupon convertible bonds and $5.5 billion in perpetual most well-liked shares.
The analysis warns of structural dangers when “curiosity funds change into unserviceable, refinancing prices spike, fairness issuance turns non-accretive, and boards query the Bitcoin technique itself.”
Rising rates of interest amplify unfavorable carry results, whereas Bitcoin value stagnation over 2-3 years may erode conviction and make fairness issuance dilutive.
The research notes “there isn’t any lender of final resort, no circuit breaker, and no refinancing facility” when Bitcoin carry trades break, making dangers “binary and reflexive.”
The analysis concludes that for long-term success, “Bitcoin should evolve from digital property to digital capital” that generates yield with out custodianship necessities.
The put up US Bitcoin ETFs Dominate Spot Volume with $10B Daily Trading – Is This Dangerous? appeared first on Cryptonews.
