How 11 audits couldn’t stop Balancer’s $128 million hack redefining DeFi risks

For years, Balancer stood as certainly one of DeFi’s most dependable establishments, a protocol that had survived a number of bear markets, audits, and integrations with out scandal.

However, that credibility collapsed on Nov. 3, when the blockchain safety agency PeckShield reported that Balancer and several other of its forks have been beneath an energetic exploit spreading throughout a number of chains.

Within hours, greater than $128 million was gone, leaving a path of drained swimming pools, frozen protocols, and shaken traders.

PeckShield knowledge confirmed the platform’s protocol on Ethereum suffered the heaviest losses of about $100 million. Berachain adopted with $12.9 million, whereas Arbitrum, Base, and smaller forks comparable to Sonic, Optimism, and Polygon recorded decrease however nonetheless important thefts.

(*11*)

As the drain unfolded, Balancer acknowledged a “potential exploit impacting Balancer v2 swimming pools,” stating that its engineering and safety groups have been investigating the difficulty with high precedence.

However, the acknowledgment did little to sluggish withdrawals throughout integrators and forks.

By the tip of the day, DeFiLlama knowledge confirmed that Balancer’s complete worth locked (TVL) had decreased by 46% to roughly $422 million from $770 million as of press time.

What occurred?

Preliminary forensics from blockchain safety agency Phalcon indicated that the attacker focused Balancer Pool Tokens (BPT), which characterize consumer shares in liquidity swimming pools.

According to the agency, the vulnerability stemmed from how Balancer calculated pool costs throughout batch swaps. By manipulating that logic, the exploiter distorted the inner value feed, creating a man-made imbalance that permit them withdraw tokens earlier than the system corrected itself.

Crypto analyst Adi wrote:

“Improper authorization and callback dealing with allowed the attacker to bypass safeguards. This enabled unauthorized swaps or steadiness manipulations throughout interconnected swimming pools, draining belongings in speedy succession (inside minutes).”

Meanwhile, Balancer’s composable vault structure, which is lengthy praised for its flexibility, amplified the injury. Because vaults may reference one another dynamically, the distortion rippled by interconnected swimming pools.

Interestingly, Coinbase’s Conor Grogan pointed out that the attacker’s method urged skilled sophistication.

Grogan famous that the attacker’s handle was initially funded with 100 ETH from Tornado Cash, implying the funds seemingly originated from earlier exploits.

“People don’t sometimes park 100 ETH in Tornado Cash for enjoyable,” he wrote, suggesting the transaction sample mirrored an skilled and beforehand energetic hacker.

DeFi belief collapse

While the exploit itself was technical, its influence was psychological.

Balancer had lengthy been thought to be a conservative venue for liquidity suppliers, a spot to park belongings and earn modest, regular yield. Its longevity, audits, and integrations throughout main DeFi platforms fostered the phantasm that endurance equaled security. The Nov. 3 breach destroyed that narrative in a single day.

Lefteris Karapetsas, founding father of the crypto platform Rotki, called it “a belief collapse” and never only a hack of the DeFi platform.

He decried the truth that:

“A protocol reside since 2020, audited and extensively used, can nonetheless undergo a near-total TVL loss. That’s a crimson flag for anybody who believes DeFi is ‘secure.’”

That response captured the broader sentiment. In a market that prizes self-custody and verifiable code, confidence had quietly changed belief because the hidden basis of DeFi.

Balancer’s failure confirmed that even mathematically sound techniques are susceptible to unexpected complexity.

Robdog, the pseudonymous developer of Cork Protocol, said:

“Whilst [DeFi] foundations have gotten safer and safer, the unhappy actuality is wise contract danger is throughout us.”

Implications for DeFi

The Balancer exploit hit at a fragile level for decentralized finance, shattering a quick interval of calm. In October, complete losses from hacks dropped to a yearly low of simply $18 million, based on PeckShield.

However, with a single incident in November, the determine has already surged previous $120 million, making it the third-worst month for DeFi breaches in 2025.

Meanwhile, this assault highlights a elementary paradox on the coronary heart of DeFi: composability, the function that allows protocols to attach and construct upon each other, additionally amplifies systemic danger.

When a core protocol like Balancer breaks, the influence ripples immediately by the networks that rely on it.

On Berachain, validators paused block manufacturing to forestall contagion. Other protocols adopted with short-term suspensions of lending and bridging capabilities.

These fast reactions restricted losses, however additionally they underscored a broader reality displaying that DeFi operates with out the coordination mechanisms that regular conventional finance.

In this area, there are not any regulators, central banks, or mandated backstops. Instead, disaster administration depends closely on builders and auditors working in tandem, usually inside minutes, to include the fallout.

Considering this, Robdog stated:

[This is] reminder why we have to develop higher danger administration infrastructure.”

Beyond the speedy technical loss, the injury to belief could also be tougher to restore.

Each main exploit erodes confidence in DeFi’s promise of self-regulating code. For institutional traders contemplating publicity to the business, the repeated failures sign that decentralized markets stay experimental.

Karapetsas famous:

“No critical capital allocates into techniques which are this fragile.”

That notion is already shaping coverage in main economies globally.

Suhail Kakar, a outstanding web3 developer, highlighted a sobering actuality within the aftermath of the Balancer exploit: even a number of, high-profile safety audits can’t assure security in DeFi.

As he famous, Balancer underwent greater than ten audits, with its core vault contract reviewed by a number of impartial corporations; but, the protocol nonetheless suffered a significant breach.

Kakar’s level highlights a rising sentiment within the business that “audited by X” is not a mark of infallibility; moderately, it displays the inherent complexity and unpredictability of decentralized techniques the place even well-tested code can harbor unseen vulnerabilities.

Authorities within the United States are creating frameworks that might introduce laws on DeFi protocols. Industry observers count on the Balancer exploit to speed up these efforts, as policymakers grapple with the rising danger of continued integration between crypto and the normal monetary business.

The put up How 11 audits couldn’t stop Balancer’s $128 million hack redefining DeFi risks appeared first on CryptoSlate.