Expert Reveals Bitcoin Quantum Survival Plan: Here’s What You Can Do

A technical debate erupted on X after on-chain analyst Willy Woo revealed what he known as a “DUMMIES GUIDE TO BEING QUANTUM SAFE,” urging Bitcoin holders emigrate cash away from Taproot addresses (bc1p) to SegWit bc1q or older P2PKH/P2SH codecs and to keep away from spending till post-quantum protections can be found.

How To Make Bitcoin “Quantum-Safe”

“In the previous it was about defending your PRIVATE KEY (your seed phrase). In the age of huge scary quantum computer systems (BSQC) which might be coming, you want to defend your PUBLIC KEY additionally. Basically a BSQC can work out your non-public key from a public key. The current day taproot addresses (the newest format) are NOT protected, these are addresses beginning with “bc1p” and so they embed the general public key into the tackle, not good,” Woo wrote on Nov. 11.

His argument hinges on a well-understood distinction in Bitcoin script sorts: Taproot (P2TR) encodes a public key immediately within the output and tackle, whereas legacy codecs like P2PKH/P2SH and SegWit P2WPKH hash the general public key and reveal it solely when cash are spent. That architectural distinction issues in a future the place a sufficiently highly effective quantum laptop may derive a personal key from a revealed public key. Independent references word that P2TR certainly carries a public key within the output, whereas P2PKH conceals it till spend time.

Woo’s interim playbook is blunt: transfer UTXOs to bc1q (or “1”/“3”) addresses, proceed receiving to that tackle, however “NEVER ship BTC out of it” till Bitcoin ships a quantum-resistant upgrade—at which level holders ought to transfer throughout low congestion, minimizing the window by which a public secret’s uncovered within the mempool: “Send your BTC into the brand new quantum protected tackle when the community is NOT congested, when you ship, you reveal the non-public key for a short while. It’s unlikely a BSQC will steal your cash in that quick window.”

He additionally warned that P2PK “Satoshi-era” outputs are most in danger and advised that misplaced cash with prior spending historical past might be weak. “Satoshi’s 1M coins utilizing an historical P2PK tackle will likely be stolen (except a future softfork freezes them),” he wrote, including that ETFs, treasuries, and trade chilly storage “will be quantum resistant if the custodians take motion” properly earlier than any mushy fork.

Woo characterised trade expectations as “2030 onwards” for the arrival of “Q-Day,” whereas stressing that requirements for quantum resistance are already rolling out throughout the broader cryptography area.

Former Bitcoin Core maintainer Jonas Schnelli agreed with the hygiene however pushed again on the framing. He known as Woo’s plan a prudent mitigation for unspent cash—“P2PKH offers you years of safety whereas Taproot exposes your pubkey instantly”—but rejected the time period “quantum protected.”

In Schnelli’s view, the second any spend is broadcast, “your pubkey hits the mempool. A quantum attacker may crack your key and RBF double-spend earlier than your transaction confirms (~10 minutes).” He concluded: “It’s a sensible precaution, not a everlasting answer.”

At press time, BTC traded at $104,693.