South Korean Prosecutors Lose Seized Bitcoin, Decline to Disclose Details
South Korea’s Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office has misplaced a big quantity of Bitcoin that was seized throughout a legal investigation, in accordance to a number of native media experiences on Jan. 22.
The case highlights a essential hole in how legislation enforcement companies deal with digital asset custody.
Phishing Attack Suspected
The prosecutors’ workplace recently discovered that Bitcoin held in custody had disappeared. The loss is believed to have occurred round mid-2025. Investigators suspect the workplace fell sufferer to a phishing assault after unintentionally accessing a rip-off web site throughout a routine inspection of seized belongings.
The prosecutors have declined to verify the precise quantity misplaced. However, sources counsel the determine may attain tens of tens of millions of {dollars}. One prosecution official informed native media that inside estimates put the loss at roughly 70 billion received ($48 million).
“We are conducting an investigation to observe the circumstances of the loss and the whereabouts of the belongings,” a prosecution official stated, declining to present additional particulars.
Questions Surrounding Crypto Custody Protocols
The incident raises basic questions on how legislation enforcement companies deal with seized cryptocurrency.
The first concern is whether or not the prosecutors adopted correct seizure procedures. If prosecutors merely confiscated a USB system containing pockets data with out transferring the Bitcoin to a separate custody pockets, the unique proprietor may doubtlessly withdraw the belongings utilizing a backup non-public key saved elsewhere. In such instances, the seizure can be incomplete from the beginning.
The pockets creation setting additionally issues. If a brand new custody pockets was created on an internet-connected pc, the non-public keys might have been uncovered from the second of technology. Standard safety apply requires creating wallets in an air-gapped setting, fully remoted from any community connection.
Private key storage presents one other vulnerability. Keeping keys on network-connected units or cloud storage creates vital hacking dangers. The correct strategy includes recording keys on bodily media, resembling paper, and storing them in a location fully disconnected from the web.
Access management is equally essential. Private keys could be copied in seconds if somebody features even temporary entry. The undeniable fact that officers reportedly accessed a rip-off web site throughout a routine examine suggests gaps in inside safety coaching and entry administration protocols.
Broader Implications for Law Enforcement
This case highlights a rising problem for authorities worldwide. As cryptocurrencies turn out to be more and more concerned in legal instances, legislation enforcement companies should develop strong custody options that meet the safety requirements for the belongings they deal with.
Traditional proof storage protocols don’t translate immediately to digital belongings. Unlike bodily proof locked in a safe room, cryptocurrency requires energetic safety measures to forestall unauthorized transfers.
The Korean prosecutors’ workplace has not disclosed whether or not it adopted established cryptocurrency custody tips or what safety measures have been in place. The ongoing investigation might reveal systemic vulnerabilities that stretch past this single incident.
For now, the case serves as a cautionary instance of what can go unsuitable when typical establishments deal with unconventional belongings with out satisfactory preparation.
The submit South Korean Prosecutors Lose Seized Bitcoin, Decline to Disclose Details appeared first on BeInCrypto.