FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried Pushes New Trial Narrative With Disputed Claims on X
FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried has launched a contemporary public marketing campaign on X that seems geared toward reinforcing his request for a brand new trial. However, a number of of the claims he’s utilizing to argue his innocence battle with court docket information and established details.
The posts, printed days after filings searching for a retrial, body Bankman-Fried as a sufferer of politically motivated “lawfare,” alleging misconduct by prosecutors, judicial bias, and retaliation towards former FTX executives.
Yet, a evaluate of the claims reveals repeated factual errors and logical gaps.
Claims of Gag Orders and Judicial Bias
Bankman-Fried claims each he and Donald Trump have been “gagged” by Judge Lewis Kaplan.
Court information present this comparability is inaccurate. Kaplan presided over Trump’s civil defamation case and imposed courtroom conduct limits, not a proper public gag order.
In actuality, Trump’s felony gag orders have been issued by different judges in unrelated instances.
In distinction, Bankman-Fried was topic to a felony gag order after repeated violations of pretrial launch situations — an ordinary judicial response.
Repeating Solvency Arguments Rejected at Trial
Bankman-Fried again asserts that FTX “was always solvent” and that prosecutors falsely claimed buyer funds have been stolen.
That argument was central to his protection at trial and was rejected by a jury, which discovered that buyer belongings have been misused and misrepresented.
Also, federal courts have persistently dominated that post-collapse asset recoveries don’t retroactively set up solvency on the time of misuse.
Mischaracterizing Prosecutorial Actions
Bankman-Fried additionally claims Trump “fired” considered one of his prosecutors, former SDNY official Danielle Sassoon.
Public information present Sassoon resigned after refusing a DOJ directive in an unrelated corruption case. She was not dismissed, and her departure had no direct connection to the FTX prosecution.
Linking DOJ Actions to Politics and Crypto Regulation
Several posts allege the Biden administration focused him as a result of he opposed Gary Gensler, donated to Republicans, and represented crypto pursuits.
While Bankman-Fried was energetic in Washington, no court docket filings or rulings have supported claims that political donations or regulatory lobbying drove the prosecution.
Judges dominated the case on documentary proof, inside messages, and witness testimony.
In truth, the FTX founder himself directly donated to Joe Biden’s campaign.
Bankman-Fried additionally defends former FTX co-CEO Ryan Salame, claiming he was coerced into pleading responsible and barred from presenting exculpatory proof.
Salame pleaded responsible to marketing campaign finance and money-transmission violations and has acknowledged these pleas in court docket. His sentencing file reveals no judicial discovering that proof was unlawfully suppressed.
The submit FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried Pushes New Trial Narrative With Disputed Claims on X appeared first on BeInCrypto.