Robinhood to Launch a Private Markets Fund: Is this Wall Street’s Version of an ICO?
Retail brokerage Robinhood introduced plans to launch a fund that might give particular person traders entry to a basket of personal corporations. The initiative is positioned as an effort to tackle persistent imbalances in entry to capital markets.
However, the construction has drawn comparisons to the preliminary coin providing (ICO) period. Though the fund will probably be regulated, it carries a number of materials dangers.
Opening Private Markets To Retail
Robinhood formally introduced its Robinhood Ventures Fund I (RVI) on Tuesday, anticipating that it will go public on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) within the coming weeks beneath the image RVI.
The fund is ready to supply publicity to a vary of private companies, including Revolut, Oura, Ramp, Databricks, Airwallex, Mercor, and Boom. Robinhood additionally plans to broaden the portfolio over time, including extra personal corporations, including Stripe.
According to the press launch, clients can request initial public offering (IPO) shares of RVI by Robinhood at $25 per share.
Unlike many conventional personal market autos, RVI is structured to be out there to a broad vary of traders with out accreditation necessities or minimal funding thresholds. The fund prices a administration payment however doesn’t impose efficiency charges. Its shares are anticipated to present each day buying and selling liquidity, topic to market situations.
“Opening up personal markets will resolve one of the best longstanding inequities in capital markets at the moment, and we’re excited to convey these alternatives to all with Robinhood Ventures Fund I,” mentioned Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev.
However, the transfer has generated skepticism in regards to the underlying dangers of not directly investing in personal corporations. For crypto veterans, the construction echoes a familiar dynamic seen in the course of the ICO growth.
Lessons From The ICO Collapse
RVI offers retail traders with publicity to personal progress corporations, a section of the market traditionally dominated by institutional capital. The fund is an SEC-registered, exchange-listed car working inside established securities laws.
However, its underlying holdings are personal corporations whose valuations are based mostly on rare funding rounds fairly than being consistently priced by the general public market. The corporations’ reported worth could not absolutely replicate altering market situations till a new funding occasion forces a reassessment.
RVI can also be a closed-end fund, which means traders can not promote their shares again at a assured worth. Instead, shares commerce on the inventory trade, the place the value can rise above or fall beneath the precise worth of the businesses the fund owns.
As a outcome, traders face two layers of uncertainty: the underlying private-company valuations and the market worth of the fund. The use of leverage may amplify beneficial properties but additionally amplify losses throughout market stress.
Structural dangers of this nature have been most seen between 2017 and 2021, in the course of the speedy expansion of ICOs.
During that growth, retail traders gained direct entry to early-stage ventures, typically pushed by forward-looking narratives regardless of unsure valuation frameworks and liquidity timelines.
By 2018, many ICO-funded initiatives failed to deliver viable products or sustainable income fashions. Token costs collapsed as speculative demand pale and regulators intensified scrutiny, wiping out billions and leaving retail traders with losses.
The episode uncovered weaknesses, together with restricted disclosure, data asymmetry, and heavy reliance on optimistic progress assumptions. While some initiatives advanced into legit networks, the broader ICO cycle became associated with valuation excesses and uneven danger distribution.
This construction doesn’t make RVI equal to an ICO, nevertheless it helps clarify why comparisons have emerged.
When High Valuations Limit Upside
In each circumstances, retail traders can entry high-growth alternatives that have been as soon as largely restricted to establishments, at the same time as transparency round valuations and exit timelines stays restricted.
The key concern raised by critics shouldn’t be regulatory oversight, however danger distribution.
When entry expands with out steady worth discovery or assured liquidity occasions, traders could face prolonged capital lock-up, sudden valuation changes, or publicity to elevated entry costs.
Some skeptics have additionally pointed to the fund’s particular composition. Several of RVI’s highlighted holdings, together with Stripe, Databricks, and Revolut, have lately raised capital at valuations of $140 billion, $134 billion, and $75 billion, respectively.
Focusing on corporations already valued very highly could depart much less room for robust future beneficial properties. It may additionally improve the chance of worth declines if private-market situations weaken.
Others contend that conventional enterprise capital methods typically search earlier-stage alternatives, the place valuations are decrease, however progress asymmetry is larger.
In that framing, critics shift the talk from entry to timing, arguing that retail traders are getting into personal markets after valuations have already climbed fairly than earlier than main progress takes locations.
The submit Robinhood to Launch a Private Markets Fund: Is this Wall Street’s Version of an ICO? appeared first on BeInCrypto.
