American Bankers Association Pushes Treasury To Enforce GENIUS Act’s Stablecoin Interest Ban
The American Bankers Association (ABA), together with 52 state bankers associations nationwide, has submitted a letter to the US Department of the Treasury, urging an implementation of the GENIUS Act’s prohibition on curiosity for fee stablecoins.
This letter responds to the Treasury’s advance discover of proposed rulemaking regarding the nation’s stablecoin invoice and underscores the significance of sustaining the legislation’s main goal: to make sure that stablecoins perform as fee devices somewhat than funding choices.
Associations Warn Of Risks To Traditional Banking
The associations articulated that the GENIUS Act’s ban on fee stablecoin issuers providing curiosity or yield displays Congress’s intention for these stablecoins for use primarily for transactions. They emphasised that the Treasury should uphold this intent to forestall any potential “exploitation of the legislation.”
They assert that with no complete interpretation of the curiosity ban, digital asset platforms would possibly reap the benefits of loopholes to offer high-yield incentives, thereby undermining the legislation’s function and posing dangers to the standard banking ecosystem.
Community banks, that are key in serving rural and underserved populations, is likely to be notably affected by deposit outflows ensuing from interest-bearing stablecoins.
The letter alleges that this disintermediation might result in a 25.9% loss in deposits, translating to about $1.5 trillion in diminished lending capacity. It additionally estimates that small enterprise and farm credit score might shrink by $110 billion and $62 billion, respectively.
To guarantee efficient enforcement of the GENIUS Act, the associations referred to as on the Treasury to undertake a broad definition of “curiosity or yield,” encompassing any financial profit, no matter terminology.
They additionally urged the prevention of evasion via associates or companions, positing that any oblique funds needs to be handled as issuer funds.
Additionally, they requested that interpretations of the time period “solely” not be overly restrictive, asserting that any profit related to holding a stablecoin ought to activate the prohibition.
Debate Over Stablecoins Delays Market Structure Bill
The teams additionally stress the necessity for considerate and balanced rulemaking that helps the monetary system somewhat than disrupts it.
However, the continuing debate surrounding stablecoin curiosity has additionally contributed to delays in passing the Market Structure Bill, which pro-crypto Senator Cynthia Lummis has labeled because the “most essential piece of digital asset laws in United States historical past.”
Recent updates to the draft of this invoice by Senate Banking Republicans, led by Chairman Tim Scott, aimed for development by the tip of September, however this timeline was missed attributable to numerous challenges, notably conflicts between banking and crypto lobbies concerning stablecoin curiosity and the invoice’s stance on decentralized finance (DeFi).
In response, a bunch of crypto-friendly Senate Democrats proposed amendments to the invoice that have been finally rejected by Republicans and the crypto trade. These amendments sought to make sure that the laws would uphold the prohibition on curiosity or yield paid by stablecoin issuers, whether or not immediately or not directly by way of associates.
Crypto advocates are actually pushing for immediate motion on market construction laws this 12 months. Mason Lynaugh, neighborhood director for Stand with Crypto, emphasised the need for the Senate to behave swiftly and intentionally.
He famous that Congress has a novel alternative to place the United States as a pacesetter within the international crypto trade, achievable solely via efficient market construction laws.
Featured picture from DALL-E, chart from TradingView.com
