Bitcoin may tumble toward $30,000 next year unless it shows real progress toward quantum proof upgrades

Bitcoin’s present bear market may worsen over the next year if the flagship digital asset fails to deal with issues about quantum computing.

In a Feb. 20 report, Charles Edwards, Capriole founder, claimed that Bitcoin’s market value ought to already be discounted for quantum threat and warned that the low cost may deepen rapidly if the community doesn’t transfer toward quantum-resistant code.

According to him:

“Bitcoin will likely be price half as a lot in little over a year if we don’t progress an improve to quantum proof Bitcoin. Without progress, Bitcoin’s Quantum Discount Factor jumps to 75% in 2029.”

This projection implies that Bitcoin’s value may drop to round $30,000 from its present stage of $68,000 by next year.

However, he warned that this might be worse, as Bitcoin’s worth may fall to zero after Q-Day if the community is unable to deal with quantum computing threats.

Despite these fears, Edwards argues that Bitcoin’s present value is undervalued by about 30% as its present truthful valuation is round $120,000, which might drop to $96,000 when accounting for quantum threat.

He wrote:

“In different phrases in case you are a long-term investor in Bitcoin, and optimistic we’ll resolve on the quantum risk within the next 2-3 years, then Bitcoin within the $60,000s is a gorgeous long-term alternative.”

Essentially, the purpose is not that a quantum attack is imminent. Edwards’ framework is that markets may begin marking down Bitcoin earlier than any “Q-Day” occasion if buyers consider the community’s governance and migration course of will take years.

In his mannequin, the danger turns into a valuation low cost now as a result of Bitcoin upgrades are sluggish and require broad coordination throughout builders, nodes, miners, exchanges, and pockets customers.

Why the market can low cost a future risk in the present day

Edwards’ word argues that quantum threat has moved from a fringe subject to a timeline drawback.

He cites a threshold of roughly 2,300 logical qubits as adequate to threaten Bitcoin’s current cryptography and estimates, based mostly on compiled trade forecasts, {that a} cryptographically related quantum occasion is probably going by 2030 and more and more possible by 2031.

According to him:

“Bitcoin Q-Day is more likely to happen by 2030 (60% likelihood) and possible by 2031 (80% likelihood).”

However, his extra rapid concern is Bitcoin’s response time.

Edwards estimates it would take roughly two years, and presumably one to a few years, to maneuver a majority of lively customers to quantum-resistant wallets and code, even in an aggressive situation.

That hole between the tempo of quantum progress and the tempo of Bitcoin governance is the idea for his “low cost issue” argument.

Meanwhile, this logic is no longer confined to crypto-native commentary.

Last year, BlackRock amended the prospectus of its iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF, explicitly warning that advances in quantum computing may render Bitcoin’s cryptography ineffective.

According to the agency, this might probably compromise pockets safety and drive network-wide adjustments that may require broad consensus and a number of forks. The submitting additionally says there isn’t a assurance that these transitions can be carried out efficiently or on time.

For markets, that issues as a result of it reframes quantum computing as a coordination and governance threat reasonably than only a {hardware} threat.

Even if the expertise arrives later than feared, uncertainty round readiness can nonetheless stress valuation within the meantime.

What is at stake, and why the talk is tough

Edwards breaks the Bitcoin quantum drawback into two elements.

First, migrating lively customers to a quantum-resistant version of Bitcoin. Second, coping with older or uncovered cash that may be weak if quantum techniques can recuperate non-public keys from public keys.

He estimates that 20% to 30% of the Bitcoin provide is “public key uncovered,” together with older output sorts and dormant cash, and warns that these cash may grow to be a significant supply of compelled provide in a worst-case situation.

At present costs, that 20% to 30% vary interprets into a really giant pool of worth. Using Bitcoin’s 21 million supply cap and a spot value close to $67,178, the at-risk vary can be roughly $282 billion to $423 billion.

Notably, CoinShares’ February 2026 evaluation places numbers on the “lengthy publicity” drawback.

It estimates that publicity is concentrated in legacy Pay-to-Public-Key (P2PK) outputs, that are equal to roughly 1.6 million BTC, about 8% of the provision, as a result of these codecs depart public keys plainly seen.

However, the portion that might trigger “considerable market disruption” if stolen rapidly is way smaller: CoinShares estimates 10,200 BTC sit in UTXOs giant sufficient to matter in a fast liquidation situation.

Bitcoin has proposals, however consensus is the exhausting half

To resolve the quantum computing risk, Edwards proposes a “lifeless man’s change” idea after migration, during which cash that don’t transfer to quantum-resistant outputs inside a set window might be frozen.

He argues that the method would higher protect community worth, but additionally acknowledges it can be troublesome to realize consensus as a result of it cuts in opposition to Bitcoin’s “not your keys, not your cash” tradition for customers who lose entry and can’t migrate.

He says that such a compelled liquidation would undermine confidence in Bitcoin’s “hard money” thesis and will set off a deep bear market.

Meanwhile, the Bitcoin neighborhood shouldn’t be standing nonetheless, and proposals are being pushed to mitigate the dangers.

A draft proposal, BIP 360, is now within the Bitcoin Improvement Proposals repository.

It introduces Pay-to-Merkle-Root (P2MR), a proposed mushy fork output kind designed to scale back sure long-term quantum dangers and pave the best way for future post-quantum signature integration.

The draft explicitly says it is a primary step and notes that safety in opposition to quicker “brief publicity” assaults may nonetheless require post-quantum signatures.

Outside of crypto, requirements our bodies are additionally pushing establishments to start out making ready.

NIST says organizations ought to start migrating techniques to quantum-resistant cryptography, reflecting a broader shift toward long-lead planning reasonably than last-minute response.

That helps the concept that the market debate is shifting from “if” to “when and the way.”

For Bitcoin buyers, that leaves a narrower query than the headline suggests. The situation shouldn’t be whether or not quantum computers can break Bitcoin in the present day.

The situation is whether or not Bitcoin can present adequate seen progress alongside an improve path to stop quantum threat from changing into a bigger low cost in an already fragile market.

The publish Bitcoin may tumble toward $30,000 next year unless it shows real progress toward quantum proof upgrades appeared first on CryptoSlate.