Did Tether and Circle’s $3 billion token minting spree protect Bitcoin from losing $60k?
The crypto market has entered a fragile part as Bitcoin dropped below the essential $70,000 degree and bounced off $60,000, a zone that has more and more acted as a gravitational pull moderately than a launchpad.
This subdued worth motion got here because the stablecoin market has surged, with Tether and Circle minting billions of {dollars}’ price of latest tokens in latest days.
At first look, the enlargement of digital greenback provide seems to counsel renewed liquidity getting into the ecosystem. However, a more in-depth have a look at flows signifies a extra cautious, structurally constrained market.
Stablecoins operate as the first liquidity rails of the crypto economic system, enabling buying and selling, leverage, settlement, and capital mobility with out touching the normal banking system.
As a outcome, modifications of their issuance and motion are sometimes scrutinized for alerts about market path.
In this occasion, the divergence between rising issuance and weakening alternate flows highlights a market that’s accumulating liquidity defensively moderately than deploying it aggressively.
Stablecoin minting accelerates
On Feb. 4, blockchain evaluation platform Lookonchain reported that Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC collectively added greater than $3 billion in newly minted provide over a three-day interval. This got here at the same time as Bitcoin and other major tokens failed to sustain any upward momentum.
The speedy enhance was additional corroborated by Tether, which reported that USDT ended the fourth quarter of 2025 with a market capitalization of $187.3 billion, a rise of $12.4 billion from the prior quarter.
According to the agency, that development occurred regardless of a contraction within the broader crypto market, by which digital asset costs fell sharply following the October 2025 sell-off.
Historically, stablecoin issuance has tended to rise during times of volatility. Traders usually rotate into dollar-pegged tokens to protect worth whereas remaining positioned to re-enter the market rapidly.
In some cycles, bursts of issuance have preceded rallies, as recent liquidity was deployed into spot and derivatives markets. In others, they’ve coincided with extended consolidation, reflecting warning moderately than conviction.
The present episode seems nearer to the latter. While provide is rising, the vacation spot and use of that liquidity matter greater than the headline numbers.
Exchange flows level to liquidity withdrawal, not deployment
Data from CryptoQuant suggests the crypto market is experiencing a sustained drawdown in risk-facing liquidity.
After increasing by greater than $140 billion since 2023, the full stablecoin market capitalization peaked in late 2025 earlier than starting to say no in December.
More telling than combination provide, nonetheless, are web flows of stablecoins into and out of exchanges.
During intervals of rising threat urge for food, stablecoins typically flow to exchanges, the place they are often readily transformed into BTC or ETH or used as margin for leveraged trades.
Outflows, in contrast, are likely to sign capital preservation, as funds are moved off exchanges into self-custody or lower-risk makes use of.
In October 2025, alternate flows mirrored distinctive momentum. Average month-to-month web inflows of stablecoins exceeded $9.7 billion, with almost $8.8 billion directed to Binance alone, in keeping with CryptoQuant.
That surge in liquidity coincided with Bitcoin’s rally towards a brand new all-time high and supported elevated leverage throughout derivatives markets.
Since November, the sample has reversed. Those inflows have been largely erased, first by a pointy decline of roughly $9.6 billion, adopted by a quick stabilization, and then renewed outflows.
The knowledge reveals greater than $4 billion in web stablecoin withdrawals from exchanges, together with about $3.1 billion from Binance.
This pattern factors to rising threat aversion and, in some instances, capitulation amongst later market entrants.
Some of the outflows may replicate inner alternate changes, as platforms cut back help for underutilized stablecoins amid weaker demand.
Even accounting for these components, the persistence of withdrawals means that liquidity is retreating from the venues the place worth discovery and leverage are most concentrated.
Stablecoin issuance and worth decouple as liquidity turns into defensive
The divergence between rising issuance and falling alternate balances displays a key distinction usually misplaced in market narratives.
Minting stablecoins doesn’t routinely translate into shopping for energy for threat belongings. Instead, it represents potential liquidity moderately than deployed liquidity.
In the present atmosphere, that potential seems to be held in reserve. Stablecoins are more and more used as a parking asset during times of uncertainty, permitting merchants to stay throughout the crypto ecosystem with out taking directional publicity.
In derivatives markets, ample stablecoin balances can dampen funding price volatility and help hedging methods, however they don’t essentially drive spot demand.
So, Bitcoin’s present battle to interrupt decisively increased regardless of the enlargement of stablecoin provide displays this dynamic.
The capital exists, however it’s getting used to handle threat moderately than to precise it.
This helps clarify why BTC fell under $70,000, because it failed to draw sustained follow-through liquidity.
Meanwhile, this sample additionally contrasts with different asset courses.
CryptoQuant notes that, though digital belongings have confronted a persistent liquidity shortfall, capital continues to flow into equities and precious metals, the place macroeconomic uncertainty has not deterred risk-taking to the identical extent.
Stablecoins cement their position as infrastructure, not a catalyst
Despite the near-term headwinds, the long-term trajectory of stablecoins stays one among structural development.
The whole stablecoin market surpassed $300 billion in 2025, cementing digital {dollars} as a core layer of crypto market infrastructure.
Tether and Circle proceed to dominate issuance and transaction exercise, at the same time as competitors from newer issuers and tokenized financial institution deposits intensifies.
Circle has emphasized USDC’s regulatory posture and reserve transparency because it courts institutional customers, whereas Tether’s world footprint has made USDT the dominant settlement asset across offshore markets.
Together, they underpin buying and selling, lending, and cross-border flows that more and more function exterior conventional banking hours and channels.
The present episode demonstrates that infrastructure development doesn’t assure quick worth appreciation. Stablecoins are increasing as instruments for settlement and capital administration, at the same time as merchants stay cautious about deploying that capital into risky belongings.
For Bitcoin, the implication is evident. The constraint is just not a scarcity of {dollars} within the system, however a scarcity of willingness to place these {dollars} to work.
Until stablecoin flows return to exchanges and funding situations shift decisively, rallies are more likely to face resistance.
In that sense, the latest wave of minting is much less a sign of imminent upside than a mirrored image of a market ready for readability.
The put up Did Tether and Circle’s $3 billion token minting spree protect Bitcoin from losing $60k? appeared first on CryptoSlate.
