JPMorgan Warns Interest-Bearing Stablecoins Could Undermine Banks

Stablecoins took heart stage throughout JPMorgan Chase’s fourth-quarter earnings name this week, as executives voiced assist for blockchain innovation whereas drawing a agency line in opposition to stablecoin designs that mirror conventional financial institution deposits.

The dialogue was prompted by a query from Evercore analyst Glenn Schorr, who requested how the financial institution views stablecoins amid renewed lobbying from the American Bankers Association and energetic congressional negotiations over digital asset laws.

JPMorgan chief monetary officer Jeremy Barnum said the bank’s position is broadly aligned with the objectives of the GENIUS Act, which goals to ascertain clear guidelines for stablecoin issuance and oversight.

Yield-Bearing Stablecoins Mimic Bank Deposits

Barnum claimed interest-bearing stablecoins threat recreating core banking features with out the regulatory framework that underpins the monetary system.

He warned that tokens providing yield merely for being held may perform like deposits whereas avoiding capital necessities, liquidity guidelines and supervisory scrutiny.

“The creation of a parallel banking system that kind of has all of the options of banking, together with one thing that appears quite a bit like a deposit that pays curiosity, with out the related prudential safeguards which were developed over tons of of years of financial institution regulation, is an clearly harmful and undesirable factor,” Barnum mentioned.

While emphasizing that JPMorgan is open to competitors and technological progress, Barnum careworn that innovation shouldn’t come on the expense of economic stability.

In his view, stablecoins designed to generate passive yield blur the road between fee devices and deposit substitutes, elevating systemic dangers if left unchecked.

Verdict: Mostly True.

JPMorgan CFO Jeremy Barnum referred to as interest-paying stablecoins a ‘parallel banking system’ with out correct regulation, echoing warnings of hazard to conventional finance.

Key Evidence: According to CoinDesk, Barnum highlighted how these merchandise mimic…

— Provenance Fact-Check (@0xProvenance) January 13, 2026

The banking trade’s unease is just not new. Last yr, trade representatives described the rise of yield-bearing stablecoins as a direct menace to banks’ funding fashions, significantly as conventional lenders proceed to supply comparatively low rates of interest on deposits.

Stablecoins have already gained traction as instruments for cross-border funds, onchain settlement and greenback entry, largely on account of their pace and decrease transaction prices.

Adding yield to these merchandise may speed up adoption and intensify competitors for deposits.

Lawmakers Move to Ban Interest on Stablecoin Holdings

That prospect is now drawing nearer scrutiny on Capitol Hill. Stablecoin rewards have become a flashpoint in lawmakers’ debate over the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, a broad proposal designed to outline regulatory tasks throughout the crypto sector.

An amended draft launched this week would prohibit digital asset service suppliers from paying curiosity or yield “solely in reference to the holding of a stablecoin,” signaling lawmakers’ intent to prevent stablecoins from operating like financial institution accounts.

At the identical time, the draft leaves room for incentive fashions tied to energetic participation in blockchain ecosystems, reminiscent of liquidity provision, governance involvement or staking.

The distinction suggests policymakers are trying to steadiness innovation with safeguards, permitting crypto networks to reward engagement whereas blocking stablecoins from changing into de facto, evenly regulated deposits.

The submit JPMorgan Warns Interest-Bearing Stablecoins Could Undermine Banks appeared first on Cryptonews.