Nevada shuts down Fortress Trust: Who holds your keys during custody consolidation?

Nevada regulators shut down Fortress Trust on Oct. 22, citing insolvency that left the custodian holding roughly $200,000 in money towards $8 million owed in fiat and $4 million in crypto.

The cease-and-desist order marked the second main Nevada trust-company collapse in two years, following Prime Trust’s entry into receivership in June 2023. Both corporations shared the identical founder.

The sample forces exchanges, fintechs, and traders to confront the place buyer belongings really sit and which regulatory frameworks stop failures from wiping out person funds.

Nevada’s Financial Institutions Division described Fortress’s situation as “unsafe and unsound,” barred deposits and asset transfers. It famous that the custodian couldn’t produce financials for July by means of September or fundamental reconciliations.

Fortress, which rebranded as Elemental Financial Technologies after a 2023 vendor breach costing $12 million to $15 million, served greater than 250,000 purchasers.

Ripple withdrew its acquisition bid days after the breach was disclosed. The failures occurred beneath Nevada’s retail trust-company constitution, which requires statutory segregation however has led to enforcement actions spotlighting governance breakdowns and gaps in examination frequency.

Four custody charters and their segregation guidelines

US establishments custody digital belongings beneath 4 frameworks: Nevada retail trusts, New York limited-purpose trusts and BitLicense custodians, OCC nationwide belief banks, and Wyoming SPDIs.

Nevada’s NRS Chapter 669 mandates trust-fund segregation and permits omnibus titling if data determine every useful proprietor, however examination frequency, set as “usually as obligatory,” has assorted in apply.

New York’s 2023 DFS custody steering requires treating buyer belongings as buyer property, prohibits custodians from utilizing buyer belongings for something past safekeeping, and requires audit trails that reconcile omnibus wallets to particular person accounts.

Sub-custody wants prior DFS approval. BitLicense holders face intensive risk-based exams funded by DFS assessments, creating frequent touchpoints and capital necessities that smaller corporations can’t meet.

The OCC confirmed crypto-custody authority by means of Interpretive Letters 1170 and 1179, making use of fiduciary requirements that require client-asset separation and operational controls.

National banks function beneath a 12- to 18-month examination cycle. The OCC’s 2022 consent order towards Anchorage Digital, which was terminated in August 2025 after remediation, confirmed that enforcement applies even to well-capitalized establishments.

Wyoming’s SPDI framework codifies bailment-based custody with strict segregation in statute and Chapter 19 rules.

SPDIs preserve separate accounts or well-marked omnibus accounts with ledger-level segregation, sub-custody requires buyer agreements naming the sub-custodian, and prohibiting commingling.

The trade-off is narrower permissions and bespoke supervision that limits fast scaling.

Where belongings really sit

Customer funds circulate by means of layers: an alternate front-end ledger mapping balances, a authorized custodian holding title or appearing as a bailee, a sub-custodian or pockets infrastructure supplier managing technical operations, and pockets tiers.

Omnibus pooling can happen at legal-custody or infrastructure layers, the place a number of clients share a blockchain handle.

Regulators allow omnibus if books preserve beneficial-ownership mappings, however failures at any layer, akin to misplaced keys, poor reconciliation, or vendor breaches, strand clients even when the custodian’s stability sheet seems solvent.

DFS steering and OCC handbooks require segregation throughout each books and technical implementation, with audit trails to show every declare.

Wyoming’s Chapter 19 mandates sub-custody agreements that explicitly prohibit commingling, closing gaps that permit technical failures to propagate into losses.

The Oct. 10 washout prompted dYdX to halt amid market volatility, illustrating protocol-layer threat when the Cosmos blockchain was hit by a liquidation edge case, forcing a short lived suspension.

Although it resumed inside 24 hours with the funds safe, it confused that Custody threat extends past authorized title to all the infrastructure stack.

Enforcement timeline

The OCC’s April 2022 consent order towards Anchorage Digital focused BSA/AML deficiencies, demonstrating federal enforcement at compliant establishments.

Termination in August 2025 after remediation marked a uncommon cooperative decision. New York’s February 2023 motion ordering Paxos Trust to stop BUSD minting confirmed DFS polices product traces at state trusts, even with sound custody.

Prime Trust’s July 2023 receivership represented the primary main state failure: Nevada FID issued a cease-and-desist on June 21, petitioned for receivership on June 26, and the court docket appointed a receiver on July 18 after filings described pockets losses and unsafe circumstances. Recovery continues by means of Prime Core’s 2025 chapter.

Fortress’s 2023 breach, coated by Ripple, foreshadowed the Oct. 22 shutdown, when Nevada FID discovered it unable to satisfy obligations or produce financials.

Maine’s 2024 consent order had restricted Fortress’s transmitter license and demanded audits, exhibiting fragmented multi-state coordination.

Winners and losers

New York and OCC entities profit as a result of their regimes embed operational self-discipline, stopping Nevada-style collapses.

DFS custodians and OCC banks function beneath frequent exams, necessary segregation with audit trails, sub-custodian approvals, and assessment-funded supervision.

Requirements increase prices however create moats that opponents can’t cross with out funding. Wyoming’s SPDI gives rigorous segregation and sub-custody guardrails, although bespoke supervision limits the quantity that may scale shortly.

Nevada belief firms face reputational headwinds. Two failures in two years make exchanges cautious within the absence of governance overhauls and attestations.

Platforms utilizing Prime Trust or Fortress face asset-recovery timelines of months or years, help prices, and litigation. At the identical time, new custody requires intensive diligence that many Nevada corporations can’t present.

The result’s a flight to supervision: corporations that afford DFS or OCC migrate there; others exit custody, consolidate beneath bigger dad and mom, or settle for decreased entry and better premiums.

The 90-day playbook

Custody agreements ban custodian use past safekeeping, prohibiting lending, rehypothecation, or pledging until clients decide in, which retail platforms won’t provide.

Auto-segregation clauses separate funds on the books and on the infrastructure layer, with month-to-month reconciliations and attestations that map addresses to house owners.

Omnibus stays permissible the place allowed, however platforms undertake DFS audit trails proving segregation even when clients share addresses, decreasing operational simplicity.

Custody diversification accelerates as exchanges contract at the very least two custodians and decouple infrastructure suppliers from authorized custodians, limiting single failures.

Fragmentation raises coordination prices however comprises threat. Proof-of-Reserves evolves into solvency disclosures that pair reserves with liabilities, although the PCAOB warns that PoR alone is “inherently restricted” and never an audit.

Platforms claiming solvency want third-party attestations protecting each balance-sheet sides with disclosed scope and methodology.

Regulatory arbitrage narrows. Firms selecting flippantly supervised charters to keep away from prices face market stress to improve.

The consequence: massive platforms affording New York or OCC supervision, and smaller platforms exiting custody, partnering as sub-clients, or accepting decreased entry.

Economics favor consolidation. The subsequent 12 months will see M&A or wind-downs amongst second-tier custodians unable to satisfy the baseline for rigor and capital.

Nevada’s Fortress shutdown exposes the fragility of flippantly supervised fashions and accelerates shifts towards fewer, bigger, extra intently examined custodians beneath New York, OCC, or Wyoming frameworks.

Exchanges face choices on diversification, segregation, and disclosure. Customers confront narrower choices with increased requirements however increased prices.

The US crypto belief mannequin consolidates round corporations which might be higher capitalized, extra clear, and extra intensively supervised, with oversight matching the systemic threat of holding billions in buyer belongings.

The submit Nevada shuts down Fortress Trust: Who holds your keys during custody consolidation? appeared first on CryptoSlate.