Ripple Depends On XRP Price, Not Market Utility, Experts Claim
The long-running dispute over what XRP is definitely for — not Ripple’s enterprise mannequin, however the token itself — exploded once more on October 30, 2025, after crypto professional Scott Melker publicly requested whether or not the asset nonetheless has a reside, defensible use case in an ecosystem now dominated by fiat-backed stablecoins.
What Is The Utility Of XRP?
“I say this with no disrespect, in search of an precise reply,” Melker wrote on X. “What is the present pitch for XRP? The token, not Ripple the corporate.” He pointed to concrete developments in cross-border settlement rails: “Western Union selected Solana for his or her stablecoin. Swift went with Linea on ETH, which was the promoting level I heard for years?” Melker then set the tone for the whole debate: “Stablecoins have clearly taken the reigns for funds, so I get their stablecoin being in play. But what utility does XRP have? Again, not trolling. Asking.” The put up had greater than 291,000 views on October 30.
The first main response got here from group members who argued that the comparability to stablecoins is structurally flawed. The account Cripto ISO 22 stated the token will not be meant to compete with bank-grade or treasury-grade stablecoins. Instead, as they put it, “XRP will not be competing with stablecoins it’s the liquidity bridge between them and between currencies, property, and fee networks. While stablecoins characterize worth, XRP represents mobility.”
According to that view, the token exists to offer “real-time settlement, FX conversion, and on-demand liquidity between CBDCs, banks, and company treasuries.” Ripple’s buildout — together with GTreasury, RLUSD, and Evernorth — is framed as an rising infrastructure layer through which the token turns into “the impartial asset connecting all types of cash. Stablecoins transfer inside silos. XRP strikes worth throughout them.”
Melker challenged that logic immediately. “This is senseless to me, maybe I’m dense,” he replied. “You can use a stablecoin because the bridge for conversions with zero loss from token volatility. Why is the token wanted particularly and never one other?” He later stated he was nonetheless in search of one thing verifiable now moderately than projections: “I feel the core concern I’ve is that persons are screaming at me about the entire issues that ‘will’ occur however no person can inform me what ‘is’ occurring. Meanwhile, Stablecoins are consuming the world.”
Ripple’s Dependence
Former CoinRoutes chairman Dave Weisberger stepped in and accused massive elements of the group of refusing to confront fundamental balance-sheet realities. “People purchase XRP as a result of it’s a meme,” he stated. “Just like ADA. Just like Doge. Just like Trump coin. It’s by no means been in regards to the utility. It’s in regards to the XRP group which is without doubt one of the strongest to this present day.” Weisberger stated that when he has requested the identical query Melker is now asking, “the ONLY coherent reply I’ve gotten is Ripple is making XRP ‘central’ to their technique. Translation: their Prime wants an unlimited stability sheet & XRP makes up nearly all of it, for now…”
He then drew a direct line between market worth and Ripple’s operational runway. “XRP doesn’t must go UP for that plan to work, however it could actually’t crash with out inflicting ache as they want the balance sheet.” He closed with the road that outlined the tone of the thread: “Make of that what you’ll, however the delusions of 100x returns are blinding you from actual evaluation…”
Weisberger’s stance is that the token’s present relevance will not be the results of unstoppable exterior adoption, however of Ripple structurally relying on the token as collateral and liquidity inside its personal stack. That argument implicitly rejects the long-standing declare that “Ripple and XRP are separate,” suggesting as a substitute that the token is deeply tied to Ripple’s stability sheet and Prime liquidity technique. If XRP’s worth holds, Ripple can deploy it. If worth collapses, Ripple’s firepower weakens.
The XRP camp answered from first ideas. The account @xrpmickle argued that even asking for a “pitch” misunderstands what the token is. “The worth proposition isn’t a brief pitch — it’s foundational,” he wrote. “[The token] serves the identical core function that lots of the prime cryptocurrencies do: it’s the native type of worth and safety layer for the distributed ledger it operates on. […] The XRP Ledger actually can not exist or function with out XRP.”
Mickle went additional, arguing that stablecoins are issued liabilities whose usefulness is inherited from the community they sit on, whereas the token is “integral — not derived.” In that telling, the token is designed to be impartial settlement-grade liquidity that may join incompatible programs, not a financial institution IOU that lives inside a company silo.
Melker, nevertheless, drew a line between what the token is architected to be and what it’s at the moment doing at institutional scale. “Nobody can inform me what ‘is’ occurring,” he wrote, pointing to what he sees as a spot between forward-looking claims and visual corridors at this time. That identical cut up surfaced in a facet alternate about Bitcoin, the place a critic requested what Bitcoin is “truly used for.” Melker responded: “That’s form of the purpose. It doesn’t have to be used for something.” In different phrases, Bitcoin might be defended as financial premium. XRP, in contrast, is marketed as transactional infrastructure, so it lives or dies on getting used.
At press time, XRP traded at $2.56.
