Stablecoins Hit $284B – Are Banks Really at Risk? Analysts Weigh In

The international stablecoin market has crossed $284 billion in circulation, reviving an extended debate about whether or not the expansion of stablecoin poses an actual menace to conventional banks or just displays a brand new layer of economic infrastructure evolving alongside them.

That query took middle stage this week after historians and economists Niall Ferguson and Manny Rincon-Cruz argued that fears of financial institution destabilization are overstated, whilst banking teams intensify their opposition to stablecoin rewards.

“No one is shocked when banks and different monetary incumbents argue towards measures that may promote innovation. But the argument that stablecoins are a supply of instability — and interest-bearing ones particularly so — is a foul one. The reverse is kind of prone to be true.”

— Niall Ferguson (@nfergus) January 26, 2026

In an opinion piece published by Bloomberg, Ferguson and Rincon-Cruz framed stablecoins as essentially completely different from unstable crypto belongings equivalent to Bitcoin.

While speculative tokens behave extra like monetary derivatives, they argued, fiat-backed stablecoins perform as fee devices whose development has accelerated following the passage of the U.S. GENIUS Act last summer.

The laws established the primary complete federal framework for fee stablecoins, limiting reserves to money, financial institution deposits, and short-dated U.S. Treasuries, whereas prohibiting issuers from making loans or paying curiosity on to tokenholders.

Since the legislation took impact, the stablecoin sector has expanded shortly.

Banks Sound Alarm as Stablecoins Expand Beyond Payments

Treasury Borrowing Advisory Committee information cited within the opinion piece confirmed that fiat-backed stablecoins have surpassed $284 billion, dominated by Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC, which collectively account for greater than 90% of the provision.

The funds, buying and selling liquidity, and demand for cross-border settlements are projected to succeed in between $2 trillion and $3 trillion out there by 2028, as cited by Treasury officers.

Banks, nevertheless, have pushed again, as trade teams have warned that stablecoins, notably when paired with rewards provided by exchanges or platforms, might draw deposits away from the banking system.

The American Bankers Association and the Bank Policy Institute have argued that large-scale migration of deposits would increase banks’ funding prices and cut back credit score availability/

JPMorgan executives have referred to interest-bearing digital dollars because the institution of a parallel banking system that lacks the identical ranges of safety.

The push by banking lobbyists to alter the proposed CLARITY Act, an expanded crypto market construction invoice, provoked resistance by crypto firms and led to delays in Senate hearings.

Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal publicly rejected claims that stablecoin rewards threaten monetary stability, saying there isn’t any proof of systemic danger and that competitors shouldn’t be conflated with instability.

No query @nfergus is true. There is zero proof–zero–that stablecoin curiosity, yield or rewards destabilizes the banking system. There is tons of proof that they supply actual competitors to banks. Those are two very various things. https://t.co/XPrwVu5TCX

— paulgrewal.eth (@iampaulgrewal) January 26, 2026

History Tells a Different Story on Stablecoins and Banks

Ferguson and Rincon-Cruz countered the banks’ narrative by turning to historical past.

They stated that stablecoins had been extra like financial institution notes than deposits, and that traditionally, notes and deposits elevated collectively, versus crowding out.

They referred to some statistics indicating that because the introduction of the USDC in 2018, American financial institution deposits have grown by over $6 trillion, whereas stablecoins elevated by roughly $280 billion, and each have been growing in the identical course.

They noticed that stablecoin rewards aren’t new and haven’t induced deposit flight even in occasions when banks had been paying near no curiosity.

The identical sentiments had been recently reiterated by the Circle CEO, Jeremy Allaire, in Davos at the World Economic Forum.

Allaire rejected speculations {that a} stablecoin reward would possibly disrupt banking, asserting that it was the identical as loyalty packages offered in common finance.

Data help the size of stablecoin utilization past hypothesis. Global stablecoin transaction value reached $33 trillion in 2025, up 72% year-over-year.

Circle-issued digital greenback USDC processed $18.3 trillion value of transactions, main the stablecoin transaction growth that totalled $33 trillion in 2025.#StablecoinTransaction #CircleUSDC #USDT https://t.co/8qYgLMVfmX

— Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) January 9, 2026

USDC processed $18.3 trillion in funds, whereas USDT dealt with $13.3 trillion.

The International Monetary Fund has acknowledged the effectivity beneficial properties stablecoins provide in cross-border funds, whereas cautioning about dangers in rising markets and the necessity for regulatory coordination.

The publish Stablecoins Hit $284B – Are Banks Really at Risk? Analysts Weigh In appeared first on Cryptonews.