White House Stablecoin Talks Stall as Banks Push for Yield Restrictions
High-stakes negotiations between U.S. banking giants and crypto executives on the White House hit a wall yesterday, ending in an deadlock over stablecoin yields.
Banks demanded restrictive “prohibition ideas” on holder rewards, whereas crypto leaders argued such bans would suffocate innovation within the digital greenback economic system.
Key Takeaways
- Banks are pushing for a broad ban on all monetary and non-financial advantages tied to holding fee stablecoins.
- Crypto companies, together with Coinbase and Ripple, rejected the proposals, warning they might stifle competitors.
- Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent faces a tough deadline of July 2026 to finalize GENIUS Act implementation guidelines.
Will Banking Interests Kill the Yield?
The core friction stems from the implementation of the GENIUS Act, signed in July 2025, which goals to manage stablecoin issuance whereas insulating conventional banking deposits.
Banks argue that interest-bearing stablecoins threaten their liquidity fashions, primarily fearing a large deposit drain if customers can earn increased yields on-chain.
This regulatory tug-of-war highlights the business’s shift towards a compliance-focused market the place regulatory pressures now dictate mission viability.
The White House Crypto Policy Council is scrambling to seek out frequent floor. Yesterday’s assembly was the second this month. With lawmakers and the business hoping to finalize guidelines by the midterm elections this November, the clock is ticking.
Banks are successfully attempting to firewall their deposit base from digital rivals, a transfer that might neuter the aggressive benefit of non-bank stablecoin issuers.
Discover: The next crypto to explode in 2026
Inside the Closed-Door Battle on the White House
According to a doc offered by the banking facet throughout the session, which included Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan Chase, the banks laid out strict “prohibition ideas.”
These ideas name for a complete ban on any advantages, monetary or in any other case, tied to holding or utilizing fee stablecoins. Attendees famous that banks took a tough line, demanding enforcement measures that go properly past the present draft of the market construction invoice.
While present legislative drafts usually bar passive yield, banks need to crush even restricted activity-based rewards.
Crypto stakeholders, together with the Blockchain Association and Ripple, reportedly “dug in” in opposition to these calls for.
The banking sector insists that exemptions for stablecoin rewards have to be extraordinarily slim in scope, leaving little room for the kinds of incentive packages that drive DeFi adoption.
Discover: New cryptocurrencies to invest in today
Implications for the Market
If these restrictions maintain, the U.S. dangers stifling the very innovation the GENIUS Act was meant to legitimize.
Investors ought to watch the July deadline carefully; failure to compromise may power a capital to flee to jurisdictions with clearer, pro-yield frameworks.
Just as Venezuela’s anti-corruption investigation rocked its local crypto industry with aggressive shutdowns, a heavy-handed U.S. ban on stablecoin yields may severely affect home liquidity.
While banks intention to guard their deposit base from disruption, the crypto market views yield as a basic function, not a bug.
If the banks win this spherical, the utility of U.S.-regulated stablecoins might be capped at easy transaction rails, stripping them of their funding potential.
Discover: February’s best crypto presales
The put up White House Stablecoin Talks Stall as Banks Push for Yield Restrictions appeared first on Cryptonews.

NEW: Details from the White House stablecoin yield assembly, per banking and crypto sources within the room:
(@CarloD_Angelo)