Why a record 13M crypto projects are now dead as Bitcoin critics still claim “anyone can launch a token”
Bitcoin developer, Jameson Lopp, posted a easy statement days after CoinGecko revealed its 2025 dead cash report.
Ignorant people claim that Bitcoin is not scarce as a result of anybody can launch their very own cryptocurrency. They fail to acknowledge that whereas anybody can copy code, nobody can copy a community of customers and infrastructure.
The timing crystallized a rigidity that is formed crypto for the reason that first Bitcoin fork. Token issuance has at all times been plentiful, as spinning up a new coin takes minutes, not months.
But CoinGecko’s newest dataset turned the “anybody can launch” argument into one thing measurable: 53.2% of tokens tracked on GeckoTerminal between July 2021 and December 2025 are now inactive, representing roughly 13.4 million failures out of 25.2 million listed.
The year 2025 alone accounted for 11.6 million of these deaths, 86.3% of all failures within the dataset.
This wasn’t gradual attrition. The fourth quarter of 2025 noticed 7.7 million tokens go darkish, a tempo of roughly 83,700 failures per day. For context, 2024 recorded 1.38 million failures throughout your entire 12 months.
The acceleration was stark: 2025’s loss of life toll ran 8.4 occasions greater than 2024’s, compressing what appeared like multi-year churn into twelve months. CoinGecko attributes a lot of the fourth-quarter spike to the Oct. 10 leverage washout, which wiped out $19 billion in leveraged positions, triggering what the agency describes as a historic drawdown.
Total crypto market cap fell 10.4% year-over-year to roughly $3 trillion, with the fourth quarter alone down 23.7%. Bitcoin declined 6.4% whereas gold surged 62.6%, a divergence that underscored macro risk-off strain hitting speculative property hardest.
Scarcity is not concerning the code
Lopp’s framing cuts by a conceptual confusion. Bitcoin’s shortage would not relaxation on the issue of writing software program, however on the issue of coordinating people round a algorithm they collectively select to not alter.
Forking Bitcoin’s codebase is trivial, whereas forking the social consensus that offers it credibility as impartial cash just isn’t. The dead cash information makes this legible.
Millions of tokens received launched, most piggybacking on low-friction platforms like Pump.fun or launchpad ecosystems that diminished issuance prices to close zero.
GeckoTerminal’s tracked undertaking rely exploded from 428,383 in 2021 to over 20.2 million by the top of 2025. Yet the survival fee collapsed.
What CoinGecko measures as “dead” is explicitly tied to buying and selling exercise: tokens that after recorded a minimum of one commerce however now not see energetic change. This definition narrows the dataset to tokens that crossed a fundamental threshold of existence, filtering out purely minted tokens that had been by no means traded.
Even with that filter, the failure fee stayed above 50%. The bottleneck wasn’t launching, however sustaining liquidity and a focus lengthy sufficient for a token to matter.
This maps straight onto what makes Bitcoin’s community scarce.
The asset advantages from a compounding moat: a safety price range funded by miners processing over a decade of transactions, a world net of exchanges and custody suppliers, derivatives markets deep sufficient to soak up institutional hedging, fee rails built-in into service provider infrastructure, and a developer ecosystem that treats protocol stability as a characteristic moderately than a bug.
Competitors can replicate the code, however they can’t replicate the put in base or the credible dedication to not change the foundations opportunistically. Network results scale nonlinearly, a precept formalized in Metcalfe’s Law-style models that hyperlink community worth to the sq. of energetic individuals.
The implication: high networks seize disproportionate worth, and most entrants by no means obtain escape velocity.
When liquidity meets stress
The 2025 die-off wasn’t purely about oversupply.
CoinGecko’s annual market recap exhibits a system beneath macro strain. Stablecoins grew 48.9% to high $311 billion in circulation, including $102.1 billion even as speculative property bled. Centralized change perpetual volumes hit $86.2 trillion, up 47.4%, whereas decentralized perpetual volumes reached $6.7 trillion, up 346%.
The infrastructure for settlement and leverage saved scaling, however the breadth of tokens collaborating in that exercise narrowed sharply.
This creates a bifurcated image. Tokens that served settlement features or captured real buying and selling curiosity survived, whereas these counting on hype cycles or skinny liquidity received crushed when danger urge for food pulled again.
October’s liquidation occasion acted as a stress take a look at, revealing which projects had actual demand and which existed solely as placeholders in speculative portfolios.
The fourth-quarter failure fee suggests that the majority tokens fell into the latter class: property launched on the idea that focus and liquidity would comply with, however that did not construct distribution or incentive alignment robust sufficient to climate a drawdown.
CoinGecko’s methodology excludes tokens that by no means traded and counts solely Pump.enjoyable graduates, which means the precise universe of minted-but-failed tokens is probably going bigger. The 13.4 million failures signify the subset that reached the purpose of registering exercise earlier than going dormant.
The broader lesson: getting listed is simple, staying related is the filter.
What comes subsequent
If 2025 units a baseline for token mortality under stress, 2026’s trajectory will depend on whether or not issuance patterns shift or whether or not the identical dynamics persist.
Three eventualities map the vary.
The first assumes high churn continues. Low-friction launchpads keep dominant, speculative issuance stays low-cost, and one other liquidity shock produces 8 million to fifteen million failures. This path mirrors 2025’s construction, with plentiful issuance assembly constrained demand, and treats final 12 months’s extinction occasion as a repeatable end result moderately than an anomaly.
The second state of affairs anticipates consolidation. Market individuals demand deeper liquidity and longer observe data.
Platforms tighten itemizing requirements, merchants focus in fewer venues, and failure counts drop to three million to 7 million as high quality filters take maintain. This path assumes that 2025’s brutal choice strain taught the market to cost survival danger extra precisely, lowering the urge for food for tokens with out distribution or infrastructure.
The third path combines new issuance with sharper bifurcation. New distribution channels, such as wallet-integrated launches, social buying and selling hooks, and layer-two expansions, drive issuance greater, however solely a small subset achieves actual community results.
Failures land within the 6 million to 12 million vary, with an excellent steeper winner-take-most distribution than 2025 produced.
The ranges aren’t predictions, however moderately believable bounds given noticed quarterly volatility and the 2024 baseline. The 7.7 million failures in final 12 months’s fourth quarter signify a stress-quarter ceiling, whereas 2024’s 1.38 million provide a decrease certain for non-extreme circumstances.
The precise end result will depend on macro circumstances, platform incentives, and whether or not the market internalizes 2025’s lesson or repeats it.
The community can’t be cloned
Lopp’s line about copying code versus copying networks lands more durable in gentle of CoinGecko’s information. Bitcoin’s shortage is not threatened by the existence of thousands and thousands of different tokens; as a substitute, it is bolstered by the failure fee of these options.
Each dead coin represents an try to duplicate the community results, credibility, and infrastructure that took Bitcoin over a decade to construct. Most could not maintain buying and selling for a 12 months.
The 2025 information quantifies one thing crypto individuals understood intuitively: issuance is plentiful, however survival is scarce. Macro stress accelerated the sorting, however the underlying dynamic predates October’s liquidation cascade.
Tokens that lacked distribution, liquidity depth, or ongoing incentive alignment received filtered out. Meanwhile, the core rails saved scaling, concentrating exercise in property and infrastructure that proved resilient.
Bitcoin’s moat is not its codebase. It’s the credible, liquid, infrastructure-rich community that opponents can launch in opposition to however can’t copy.
The code is free. The community prices every little thing.
The put up Why a record 13M crypto projects are now dead as Bitcoin critics still claim “anyone can launch a token” appeared first on CryptoSlate.
