WLFI Token Drops 50% After Justin Sun Blacklist: Centralization Risk?

The WLFI token from World Liberty Financial as soon as fell to $0.16—slicing its worth in half—after builders blacklisted Justin Sun’s pockets and froze billions of tokens related to him.

This transfer has deepened divisions in the neighborhood and raised issues about centralization and the outsized affect of huge traders in new token launches.

WLFI Blacklisting: What Happened to Justin Sun’s Holdings?

WLFI launched amid vital hype and high buying and selling volumes on main exchanges. However, sharp worth swings and decisive actions by high stakeholders have intensified skepticism. With scrutiny mounting, discussions about transparency and governance now dominate the mission’s outlook.

Only a couple of days after WLFI’s debut, World Liberty Financial froze Justin Sun’s wallet, locking 540 million unlocked and a pair of.4 billion locked WLFI tokens. Sun, having invested $75 million to accumulate about 3 billion tokens, noticed his giant stake rendered inaccessible, sending shockwaves by way of the crypto world.

This motion got here amid suspicions of Sun—or an change he influenced—shifting tokens to suppress the value. WLFI’s first-hour buying and selling volumes surpassed $1 billion, whereas the value dropped steeply from $0.40 to underneath $0.20.

On-chain information confirmed that no less than 50 million WLFI—value about $9 million—have been transferred from Sun’s pockets simply earlier than the blacklist. While Sun claimed these have been “minor deposit assessments” that might not have an effect on the market, blockchain analysis challenged that assertion. This led to accusations that Sun and a few exchanges could have offloaded giant quantities on the primary day.

Public concern grew as blockchain trackers flagged Sun’s and choose change addresses’ vital WLFI holdings and actions. As of early September 2025, Sun nonetheless holds 545 million WLFI, valued at greater than $100 million at current costs. Records present Sun employed a number of artistic strategies to maneuver tokens, generally surpassing the vesting schedule outlined publicly.

Community Reaction: Centralization and Trust within the Spotlight

The resolution to freeze Sun’s pockets introduced little settlement inside the WLFI group. Many argue the transfer exposes the hazards of centralization and developer management, particularly for the reason that staff may goal high-profile accounts. Critics contend that such actions contradict WLFI’s decentralized governance claims and weaken holders’ belief.

Others argue the freeze was justified, citing manipulation makes an attempt by giant traders and affiliated exchanges. The controversy widened when HTX—a platform linked to Sun—supplied 20% APY on WLFI deposits. This raised questions on whether or not consumer funds have been offered to satisfy vital withdrawals or suppress costs on different exchanges.

An trade commentator famous the vulnerabilities highlighted by the launch, together with token distribution and the huge share owned by insiders and exchanges. Although solely 6.8% of WLFI’s provide formally unlocked at launch, precise buying and selling advised far larger liquidity—hinting at promoting stress from a couple of giant insiders.

Record buying and selling quantity and declining costs shortly modified expectations for the WLFI launch. Instead of a constructive debut, the occasion turned a cautionary story about concentrated possession, energy dynamics, and the challenges dealing with token holders—even in community-oriented projects. Regulators more and more look at high-profile launches and political ties. The consequence of the WLFI saga could affect transparency and governance requirements within the crypto trade.

As of publishing hours, the WLFI worth rebounded to $0.18, however it was nonetheless over 15% down from the day past.

The publish WLFI Token Drops 50% After Justin Sun Blacklist: Centralization Risk? appeared first on BeInCrypto.