Trump wants the US to become a Bitcoin whale, but Congress controls the wallet
President Donald Trump mentioned on Aug. 20 that the US is contemplating accumulating sizable quantities of Bitcoin and different cryptocurrencies. Current legislation offers his administration a number of methods to enhance federal crypto holdings, although no public authority offers Treasury a funded program for multibillion-dollar open-market purchases.
For Bitcoin, Trump’s 2025 govt order already directs Treasury and Commerce to develop budget-neutral acquisition methods. For non-Bitcoin belongings, the similar order limits further acquisitions to forfeiture and civil-money-penalty channels until additional govt or legislative motion happens.
A second govt order might remove that restriction for belongings equivalent to Ethereum, XRP, and Solana. Congress would nonetheless management federal appropriations and any funding powers that present statutes reserve to lawmakers.
The 2025 order additionally requires implementation to adjust to relevant legislation and the availability of appropriations, language that units the boundary round Trump’s choices. A budget-neutral technique nonetheless wants a lawful supply of belongings or funds, plus authority for Treasury to use them.
The White House’s July 2025 digital assets report mentioned work on operationalizing the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and Digital Asset Stockpile would proceed. The public report recognized no authorized Treasury program for open-market Bitcoin purchases.
| Action | Bitcoin | ETH, XRP, SOL and different crypto | What nonetheless limits Trump |
|---|---|---|---|
| Keep forfeited belongings | Already allowed | Already allowed | Final authorized title, restitution, forfeiture guidelines |
| Seek budget-neutral acquisition routes | Already directed by 2025 EO | Restricted until additional motion happens | Must adjust to legislation and appropriations |
| Accept donated crypto | Plausible with Treasury present authority | Would possible want EO clarification | Gifts are voluntary, not a market-buying program |
| Launch open-market purchases | No clear public authority | No clear public authority | Congress controls spending and statutory funding powers |
| Remove altcoin acquisition restriction | Not wanted for BTC | Possible by way of second EO | Does not create funding or buy authority |
Forfeitures, items and taxes supply the clearest govt routes
Qualifying Bitcoin obtained by way of closing felony or civil forfeiture enters the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, whereas qualifying non-Bitcoin belongings enter the Digital Asset Stockpile.
In January 2026, the US obtained authorized title to greater than $400 million in cryptocurrencies and different belongings tied to the Helix mixer case.
Victim restitution, law-enforcement obligations, and forfeiture statutes can even scale back the quantity Treasury retains. Trump can not flip forfeiture into a scheduled acquisition program with a goal buy dimension.
Section 321(d) of Title 31 offers the Treasury secretary authority to settle for, maintain, and administer items of actual or private property after they assist Treasury’s work.
Bitcoin qualifies as private property for federal tax functions. Treasury now administers the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, giving the division a believable statutory foundation to settle for donated BTC into the federal framework.
A supplemental govt order might explicitly acknowledge items as an authorized supply for the reserve.
That similar order might open the Digital Asset Stockpile to donated non-Bitcoin belongings. Trump’s present order blocks these additions outdoors forfeiture and civil-money-penalty proceedings till additional govt or legislative motion happens.
Section 6311 of the Internal Revenue Code lets Treasury obtain taxes by way of commercially acceptable means the Secretary chooses underneath Treasury laws.
Federal taxpayers at the moment pay in {dollars}, and the IRS doesn’t settle for digital belongings. Treasury could explore regulations that allow Bitcoin funds underneath Section 6311. The division would additionally want to decide whether or not it might hold acquired BTC in the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.
The Bitcoin for America Act would expressly allow federal taxes to be paid in Bitcoin and would direct acquired BTC into the reserve, but the invoice has not become legislation.
These routes might broaden federal crypto holdings by way of belongings the Treasury receives immediately.
| Route | How it could work | BTC affect | Non-BTC affect | Main limitation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forfeitures | Crypto obtained by way of closing felony or civil forfeiture enters federal custody | Can develop the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve | Can develop the Digital Asset Stockpile | Timing and dimension rely upon instances, not coverage targets |
| Civil cash penalties | Crypto acquired by way of qualifying enforcement resolutions | Can add BTC with out market purchases | Can add non-BTC belongings | Irregular and legally case-specific |
| Gifts | Treasury accepts donated private property that aids its work | Plausible route for donated BTC | Could require supplemental EO for stockpile therapy | Voluntary; no predictable scale |
| Tax funds | Treasury explores accepting BTC underneath tax-payment guidelines | Potential future acquisition channel | Current EO blocks non-BTC growth absent additional motion | IRS doesn’t at the moment settle for crypto; retention authority unresolved |
| Bitcoin for America Act | Congress expressly permits BTC tax funds | Would direct acquired BTC into reserve | BTC-specific until expanded | Not legislation |
Ideas that run into statutes written by Congress
Treasury might promote ETH, SOL, XRP, or different stockpile belongings and direct the proceeds towards BTC, but federal fiscal legislation complicates that transaction as a result of authorities receipts typically move again into Treasury until one other statute authorizes their reuse.
The American Reserve Modernization Act of 2026 would expressly authorize Treasury to promote, alternate, or convert non-Bitcoin stockpile belongings and use the proceeds to enhance the Bitcoin reserve or scale back federal debt.
The Exchange Stabilization Fund presents a related impediment. Section 5302 authorizes Treasury to deal in gold, foreign exchange, devices of credit score and securities for exchange-stability functions.
The BITCOIN Act would add Bitcoin to that statute and set up a program to buy 200,000 BTC per 12 months for 5 years. Congress has not but enacted these provisions.
Tariff income additionally requires congressional authority earlier than Treasury can use it for crypto purchases. Federal receipts typically enter Treasury, and the Constitution offers Congress management over appropriations.
A president can direct companies to research a tariff-funded Bitcoin program, but spending these receipts on BTC requires legal authority overlaying that objective.
Gold faces two statutory obstacles. Treasury gold certificates carry a congressionally fastened worth of $42 and two-ninths of a greenback per nice troy ounce. Proceeds from Treasury gold gross sales are legally directed towards lowering the nationwide debt.
The BITCOIN Act would rewrite the gold-certificate framework and use a part of the ensuing remittance to finance Bitcoin purchases.
The Federal Reserve gives no present workaround. Its open-market authority covers belongings outlined by the Federal Reserve Act, and crypto falls outdoors the present framework. Former Fed chair Jerome Powell beforehand mentioned the Fed lacks authority to personal Bitcoin underneath present legislation.
Trump’s proposed sovereign wealth fund additionally lacks a funded normal funding mandate. His February 2025 order instructed Treasury and Commerce to design a plan overlaying funding, governance and investment strategy. The order made implementation topic to relevant legislation and appropriations.
The platinum-coin statute reaches the similar fiscal boundary. Treasury has broad discretion over the denomination of platinum cash, but minting one doesn’t authorize a Bitcoin buy. Congress nonetheless controls the authorized objective for which federal funds could also be spent.
Congress determines whether or not Bitcoin accumulation turns into a sovereign bid
The bull case requires lawmakers to flip one among these ideas into specific buy authority. A BITCOIN Act-style program might create scheduled acquisitions, establish a financing mechanism, and provides Treasury clear statutory authority.
A narrower invoice might authorize stockpile conversions, Bitcoin tax funds, or one other devoted income channel.
That framework would give markets a federal purchaser whose scale and cadence traders might mannequin. Extending the program to different crypto would require further guidelines overlaying eligible belongings and funding.
The bear case leaves the federal authorities accumulating crypto by way of irregular channels. Forfeitures would proceed including belongings when instances conclude, items might broaden holdings if Treasury formally adopts that route, and tax-payment guidelines might stay underneath research.
| Scenario | What occurs | Legal requirement | Market implication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Status quo | Government retains forfeited crypto and research acquisition routes | Existing 2025 EO | Holdings develop irregularly, with no predictable shopping for strain |
| Executive growth | Trump indicators a second EO permitting items and lawful non-BTC receipts | EO plus present Treasury authority | More belongings can enter custody, but scale stays restricted |
| Tax-payment path | Treasury or Congress allows BTC tax funds | Regulations and/or laws | BTC accumulation turns into recurring but depends upon taxpayer use |
| Stockpile conversion | Treasury sells or converts non-BTC belongings into BTC | Congressional authorization is the clear route | Existing crypto holdings might be reshaped into BTC |
| Full sovereign bid | Congress authorizes scheduled purchases and financing | New statute, funding mechanism, funding authority | Markets can mannequin a recurring federal purchaser |
Under that end result, Trump’s newest feedback would produce no scheduled federal buy program. Treasury holdings might nonetheless enhance, but their dimension would rely upon belongings acquired by way of particular authorized channels.
Trump has room to broaden how crypto enters federal custody. A recurring multibillion-dollar shopping for program would require Congress to present the authority, funding mechanism, or each.
The submit Trump wants the US to become a Bitcoin whale, but Congress controls the wallet appeared first on CryptoSlate.
